Professor Gary Libecap, an internationally acknowledged authority on resource economics, gave a lecture in the Festivities Hall of the University of Iceland on 21 October 2023 about resource utilisation and private property rights. He stated the general arguments for property rights in natural resources and then moved on to their formation. It was relatively easy to form property rights in land and livestock by fencing and branding, he said. It was more complicated but nevertheless possible to form property rights to rivers and lakes, water springs and oil wells, gold and coal mines and fish stocks. When the access to a scarce resource, hitherto a commons with open access, had to be restricted, quite often so-called ‘grandfathering’ was the most efficient way of allocating property rights initially. This meant that those with a hisory of utilising the resource would get rights to it in accordance with their utilisation. This would minimise the disruption to their way of supporting themselves when access had to be restriced. It was also likely to gain their acceptance. In the Icelandic fisheries this would imply that the harvesting rights (catch quotas) being defined would initially be allocated to those who had been fishing according to catch history, which was precisely the rule adopted when the rights, or quotas, were first allocated. Before Libecap gave his lecture, Hannes H. Gissurarson, Professor Emeritus of Politics at the University of Iceland, published an article about Libecap and the idea of grandfathering.

In an interview in Morgunbladid on 1 November 2023 Libecap described his recent research, including the comparison of clearly defined and therefore efficient mining rights in the United States and the much less efficient such rights in Latin America. He also discussed the utilisation of oil and gas, and of the Amazon forest, of fish stocks and of water springs in dry regions. Libecap said that the Icelandic system of fisheries management was widely regarded as the most efficient one in the world and that Ragnar Arnason, the Icelandic Professor of Fisheries Economics, was internationally respected for his contributions to resource economics. Libecap added that natural resources were not being exhausted; the dire predictions by the authors of The Limits to Growth had turned out not to be correct.

From left: Peter Hefele, Marko Milanovic Litre, Harrison Pitt, Hannes H. Gissurarson

The Brussels think tank New Direction held a large conference in Madrid on 20–22 September 2023 where right-wing intellectuals and activists met to discuss issues, as well as to attend the annual Margaret Thatcher Dinner. The speaker this year was Dr. Robin Harris who had been a speechwriter for Thatcher and also written a book about her.

Hannes H. Gissurarson, Professor Emeritus of Politics at the University of Iceland, spoke in favour of cooperation between conservatives and liberals. He suggested that there was a conservative branch of classical liberalism which combined the strong case for free trade, private property, and limited government with the plausible conservative intuition that individuals needed a home, the participation in a group, a sense of belonging, some meaning in life.

A speaker at the conference brought up the well-known ‘tragedy of the commons’ where unlimited access to a limited resource led to its over-utilisation. Gissurarson responded that this was a problem which could often be solved by market transactions, citing the example of the Icelandic fisheries system. He pointed out that in Africa where some elephant and rhino stocks were endangered, with one stroke of the pen poachers could be turned into gamekeepers by defining private property rights to the herds of those animals to the inhabitants of villages nearby. This would imply their effective utilisation instead of an unenforceable ban on doing so.

Gissurarson said that he agreed with conservatives that society was not only an amalgamation of unattached individuals. People needed roots, connections, respect for time-tested customs, conventions and traditions. He however rejected the notion expressed by some at the conference that our moral commitments only extended to other people belonging to the same nation. They extended to the whole of mankind although they were quite limited and consisted mostly in leaving others alone.

Dinner 20 September, with Terry Anker, Barbara Kolm, Robert Tyler, and others.

Gissurarson and Cleverly.

Jamie Borwick, the fifth Baron Borwick, invited Hannes H. Gissurarson, Professor Emeritus of Politics at the University of Iceland, to a reception he held on 28 June 2023 in the Cholmondeley Room at Westminster Palace, the British House of Parliament, on the occasion of Adam Smith’s 300th anniversary. It is not known when exactly Smith was born, but he was baptised on 5 June 1723 which is traditionally considered his birthday. The British Foreign Secretary, James Cleverly, gave a talk at the reception where he argued that Smith’s message about economic freedom was still timely and relevant. He reminded the audience however that freedom had to be defended. It was now being threatened by two bellicose and heavily armed powers, Russia and China.

Gissurarson had a discussion with Cleverly about foreign affairs. He has publicly stated that Iceland should make it a priority to seek friendship and alliance with her North Atlantic neighbours, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Norway, while maintaing cordial relations with the European Union.

Gissurarson has also described how Adam Smith had presented two powerful ideas that had to be recalled regularly. One was that one’s gain need not be another’s loss. Everybody can gain by the international division of labour if and when different abilities and resources were utilised in free market transactions. The second idea was that there can be coordination without commands. A system can be formed without anybody forming it. Smith used the expression ‘the invisible hand’ about individuals seeking only their own advantages but working unintentionally for the public good.

Hannes H. Gissurarson, Professor Emeritus of Politics at the University of Iceland, was one of the lecturers in a summer school for young conservatives in Sundbyholm Castle near Eskilstuna in Sweden on 18 June 2023. He posed two questions. The first was why conservatives should support the free market. The answer was that the free market was nothing but a venue for individuals to pursue their own goals, including the practices and traditions that conservatives wanted to protect and develop. Government on the other hand tends to undermine such practices and traditions. With its monopoly on force it was often a much more radical and dangerous factor of transformation than the market. Gissurarson pointed out that social units like the family and the nation were not totally fixed and immovable. Individuals were born into one family and established another one. People move between states If you are to love your country, it has to be lovely, to quote Edmund Burke. The Nation is a daily plebiscite, Ernest Renan said.

The second question was: Why should Nordic conservatives support classical liberalism? The answer was that liberty was their second nature, their identity. It was a tradition which had been developing for millennia. As early as 98 AD the Roman chronicler Tacitus had described how German tribes governed themselves. When Bishop Ansgar sought to christen Sweden in mid-ninth century, a king told him that he had to obtain the consent of his subject at their assemblies. Later in that same century, an emissary of the French king asked Rollo and his men who was the leader, and they replied that they were all equal. In Snorri Sturluson’s Heimskringla, the idea is expressed time and again that kings have to obey the same law as their subjects and that they could be deposed if they did not do so, as Torgny the Lawman said to the Swedish king in 1018. To this medieval tradition of legal certainty and an implicit social contract, Anders Chydenius added an argument for free trade, and Nikolaj F. S. Grundtvig an argument for free associations, such as private schools, independent congregations, spontaneous associations and collectives. This Nordic tradition of liberty had withstood the assaults both of absolutist kings in ancient times and of power-hungry social democrats in modern times.

From left: Thordis Edwald, Jonas Sigurgeirsson, Karitas Kvaran, Armann Thorvaldsson, Hannes H. Gissurarson, Kjartan Gunnarsson, Sigridur Snaevarr, Baldur Gudlaugsson, and Rosa Gudbjartsdottor.

The Public Book Club, Almenna bokafelagid, AB, held its annual general meeting on 26 May 2023. AB was founded on 17 June 1955 in order to counter the disproportionate influence of the communist-dominated book club Language and Culture, Mal og menning, supported by Soviet money, the notorious ‘Russian Gold’. AB is now a publishing company rather than a book club, however. AB’s Director, Jonas Sigurgeirsson, gave a report about last year for the other shareholders, Kjartan Gunnarsson, Baldur Gudlaugsson, and Armann Thorvaldsson. Also present was the Academic Adviser to AB, Professor Hannes H. Gissurarson. One of the most-discussed books published by AB in 2022 was A Banker’s Reckoning (Uppgjor bankamanns) by Larus Welding who was Director of Glitnir Bank when the Icelandic banking sector collapsed in October 2008. He describes the collapse, and the long and brutal criminal investigations to which he was subsequently subjected. The other book was The Impeachment Case Against Geir H. Haarde (Landsdomsmalid) by Hannes H. Gissurarson who argues that the process was deeply flawed by which Haarde, Prime Minister at the time of the bank collapse, was indicted and ultimately acquitted of anything except an alleged minor formal lapse (not putting the impending bank collapse on the agenda of government meetings). Even that conviction which did not entail any punishment, and with the state being ordered to bear all the costs of the process, was based on very weak legal grounds. Gissurarson has written in English a summary of the book which has been published in parts 1, 2 and 3 in the European Conservative.

From left: Robert Tyler, Heidar Gudjonsson, His Excellency Bjarni Benediktsson, Dr. Barbara Kolm, Her Excellency Gabriela von Habsburg. In the background can be seen Dean Stefan Hrafn Jonsson of the School of Social Sciences and Professors Stephen Macedo and Ragnar Arnason.

After the conference held by the University of Iceland on 12 May 2023 because of the retirement of Hannes H. Gissurarson, Professor of Politics, who turned seventy in February, His Excellency Bjarni Benediktsson, now Finance Minister and previously Prime Minister, invited the speakers and some other guests to dinner at the official Minister’s House, Radherrabustadurinn, in Tjarnargata. This had been the residence of Icelandic prime ministers from 1906 to 1942, but was now used for special receptions and meetings. In his welcoming remarks Minister Benediktsson said that Professor Gissurarson had been an inspiration to himself and many others of his generation and no less to younger generations. He gave a toast to Gissurarson. The Professor recalled in his response that one of his friends, Sir Antony Fisher, had always asked people to raise their glasses ‘To Peace and Low Taxes’. This was his favourite toast.

From left: Dr. Stefania Oskarsdottir, Professor Ragnar Arnason, Dr. Neela Winkelmann, Professor Stephen Macedo, Her Excellency Barbara von Habsburg, Professor Hannes H. Gissurarson, Dr. Barbara Kolm (half-hidden), Kjartan Gunnarsson (standing) and Her Excellency Sigridur Andersen, former Minister of Justice.

During dinner, three friends of Professor Gissurarson gave short speeches. Independent investor Kjartan Gunnarsson, former Executive Director of the Independence Party, recalled that the two of them had been fighting for freedom in Iceland for more than fifty years. They had even been convicted together for operating an illegal radio station in 1984, in protest against the government monopoly on broadcasting. Dr. Barbara Kolm, Director of the Hayek Institute in Vienna, said that Professor Gissurarson had not only been an inspiration to young Icelanders, but also to young people in Europe, North America and South America where he had lectured, not least on themes from his excellent recent book, Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers, available online. Dr. Tom Palmer, Vice-President for International Affairs at Atlas Network, said he had first met Professor Gissurarson at the Mont Pelerin Society meeting in Cambridge in 1984 and that he had soon discovered that he was not only a loyal friend, but also an able spokesman for classical liberal ideas. In his response, Gissurarson said that he was only retiring from the University of Iceland, but certainly not from his scholarly research, writing and lecturing whic he enjoyed. When he turned seventy, he had not considered himself to have aged: he had just matured. In fact, age was an issue of mind over matter. If one didn’t mind, then it didn’t matter.