Daniel Mitchell: “Reduce Taxes and Create Growth”

Dr. Daniel Mitchell, senior tax policy analyst at Cato Institute in Washington DC, gave a talk about progressive taxes at the University of Iceland 16 November 2012, invited by RNH and the newly-f0unded Icelandic Union of Taxpayers. Mitchell pointed out that the main role of taxes is to obtain the revenue necessary to pay for government services. By double taxation, such as taxes on dividends and capital gains, the accumulation of capital, necessary in a growing economy, is made more difficult. Tax authorities should not discriminate between future consumption (or investment) and present consumption. Mitchell argued that a high progressive incomes tax as has recently been imposed in Iceland, and a special wealth tax were both very inefficient kinds of taxes.

Mitchell’s visit to Iceland provoked much discussion. The daily Morgunbladid published an interview with Mitchell 20 November 2012. Vidskiptabladid, a weekly business magazine, gave an account of his lecture 1 December. Oli Bjorn Karason, economist and alternate Member of Parliament for the Independence Party, published an article about Mitchell’s message in Morgunbladid 21 November. Lawyer Finnur Thor Vilhjalmsson criticized Mitchell in an article in left-wing newspaper DV 8 December 2012.

Mitchell Slides 2012

Comments Off

Against Progressive Taxation, Friday 16 November: 12–13

The present government in Iceland has reintroduced a progressive incomes tax, and a special tax on wealth, both abandoned under the David Oddsson governments of 1991–2004. It has also increased taxes on corporations and capital. Friday 16 November Dr. Daniel Mitchell, Cato Institute’s taxation specialist, will discuss the case against progressive taxes and for the flat tax. The meeting will take at the University of Iceland, in the Haskolatorg, room HT-102, 12–13. The newly formed Icelandic Taxpayers’ Union and RNH are co-sponsoring this event.

Daniel Mitchell received his MA. in economics from the University of Georgia and his Ph.D. from George Mason University in Virginia. He worked for the Senate Finance Committee and Heritage Foundation, before becoming a Senior Scholar at the Cato Institute in Wasington DC, specialising in tax matters. He has written a book about the flat tax, and is a regular contributor to the Wall Street Journal, New York Times and other newspapers. He is a frequent visitor to Iceland and has published papers on taxation in Iceland.

Mitchell’s lecture is a part of the project “Europe, Iceland and the Future of Capitalism”, which RNH organises in cooperation with AECR, the Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists, whose patron is Baroness Thatcher of Kesteven.

Comments Off

Mats Persson: “The EU economy is stagnant”

Mats Persson, Director of London think tank Open Europe, gave a talk 12 November on European integration, invited by RNH, the Institute of International Affairs at the University of Iceland and the Icelandic website Evropean Watch. Persson pointed out that the EU faced both political, economic and monetary crises. He argued that the authors of the euro project had been far too optimistic about one currency being feasible for different economies. Economic productivity in the PIIGS-countries, Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain, was not as high as in Germany, the Netherlands and Finland. The PIIGS-countries had not lowered domestic costs in the same way as for example Estonia. It was, Persson said, interesting to compare the share of different clusters of states in World GDP: The US and the EU as a whole were slowly reducing their share, whereas the eurozone itself was reducing its share quite rapidly, and the BRICS-countries, Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, were increasing their share. In many eurozone countries the economies were stagnant and unemployment high. The three options available were not good: 1) cost-cutting in the weaker countries and temporary support from the stronger ones; 2) greater centralisation in Brussels; 3) Greece and possibly other countries leaving the eurozone. Morgunbladid published an interview with Persson 12 September, and the same day Icelandic Broadcasting Corporation broadcast an interview with him. Persson’s talk will soon be available on Youtube.

Persson Slides

Comments Off

Disadvantages of Further EU Integration, Monday 12 November: 12–13

Mats Persson, director of London think tank Open Europe, will give a talk at a meeting held by RNH, The Institute of International Affairs at the University of Iceland and the European Watch, Monday 12 November 12–13 in room 201 in Oddi, the social sciences house of the University of Iceland. The title of his talk is “How Further Integration Could Hurt Europe’s Competitiveness”. Former Justice Minister Bjorn Bjarnason will chair the meeting. Open Europe is a think tank established by British businessmen and maintains offices in London and Brussels. A German sister organisation has opened an office in Berlin. The founders of Open Europe support European co-operation, but are sceptical about further political integration. They believe in searching for a new model for European co-operation, more in tune with modern economic realities and preferences of citizens. The chairman of Open Europe’s board is Lord Leach of Fairford. Mats Persson was born in Bankeryd in Sweden and holds a Master’s degree from the London School of Economics. He has been director of Open Europe since 2010, but was a political consultant before that in Washington DC. He maintains a regular blog on the Telegraph website.

The whole series of lectures on “Europe, Iceland and the Future of Capitalism”, organised by RNH in 2012–13 jointly with several other institutes and associations, is in co-operation with AECR, the Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists.

Comments Off

Hannes H. Gissurarson: “Mao was a Monster”

Photo: Mbl./Kristinn

Professor Hannes H. Gissurarson read a paper on “Mao: The Story Which Has Been Told” at a meeting organised by the Confucius Institute at the University of Iceland 2 November 2012. He gave an account of the controversy in Iceland about Jung Chang and Jon Halliday’s biography, Mao: The Unknown Story, published in a translation by Olafur Teitur Gudnason in 2007. Professor Gissurarson responded to several criticisms directed at the book by Geir Sigurdsson, a Chinese-speaking philosopher and former director of the Icelandic Confucius Institute, and historian Sverrir Jakobsson. According to Professor Gissurarson, the book was an extraordinary accomplishment, the criticisms of it being about minor details, mostly debatable, and not changing the main fact that Mao was one of the worst mass murderers of the Twentieth Century, comparable to Stalin and Hitler. Using the criteria laid down in the Nuremberg Trials, Mao was guilty of crimes against the peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Professor Gissurarson showed a video of Marshal Peng Dehuai—who had opposed Mao’s insane “Great Leap Forward”—being beaten and humiliated during the Cultural Revolution. Professor Gissurarson pointed out that much was already known about Mao’s crimes in Iceland: In 1952, for example, former missionary Johann Hannesson wrote a series of newspaper articles about mass executions in China after the communist victory in the civil war, and in 1963 private letters from an Icelandic student in China, Skuli Magnusson, to his fellow socialists, on the 1958–62 famine and Maoist terror, were published, without his consent. The lecture was well-attended, and will soon be available on Youtube. Former Justice Minister Bjorn Bjarnason blogged about it, and 10 November 2012 Morgunbladid reported on it.

Gissurarson Slides 02.11.2012

Comments Off

The Controversy on Mao’s Legacy, Friday 2 November: 12–13

The next event on the RNH calendar is a lecture which Professor Hannes H. Gissurarson is giving on the invitation of the Northern Light Confucius Institute at the University of Iceland Friday 2 November 2012 in Room 207 in the main building of the University. The topic is “Mao: The Story Which Was Told in Iceland”. There he will discuss the monumental biography, Mao: The Unknown Story, by Jung Chang and Jon Halliday, published in an Icelandic translation in 2007. He will defend it against criticisms by Chinese-speaking philosopher Geir Sigurdsson, former director of the Confucius Institute, and historian Sverrir Jakobsson. Professor Gissurarson will discuss the controversy over the battle of the Luding bridge; the real number of victims in the mass executions and famines instigated by Mao; the comparison of Mao and Hitler; and other interesting historical questions.

In 2009, Professor Gissurarson translated the Black Communism of Communism into Icelandic, and in 2011 he published a 624 pp. history of the Icelandic communist movement, with several chapters about the relationship between Icelandic and Chinese communists. Jung Chang and Halliday’s biography of Mao is still prohibited in China. While the meeting is held by the Confucius Institute, his lecture, offering a comparative perspective on communism, forms a part of the project “Europe of the Victims”, organised jointly by RNH and AECR, the Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists.

Comments Off